Zewt Links

Wednesday, 1 August 2007

Ecologically yours

Feeling rather fatigue today and need sleep and hence, going to take an easy way out. Have you taken the ecological test yet?

Do take it here.

Mine was 2.4 planets.
Someone left a comment asking me to blog about the environment. Well, let's just say it's in the pipeline.

How many footprints did you leave behind? How many planet(s) is needed if everyone is to live life like you?

47 comments:

  1. Total Footprints: 4.5 and 2.5 planets.

    Phew~~~

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eh.. 1.8 1 planet. Maybe bcos I take lrt most of the time.

    anyway, read the post you recommended. Got you point, but not sure if you got mine. I'll keep it short, "ppl who doesn't even know how to pretend to be good to others can't reach far".
    Makes sense to anyone out there? hmm :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hahaha! 2.5 footprints and 1.4 planets if everyone lives like me. Is that too bad? :D

    ReplyDelete
  4. duh!

    i can't do it!

    my country isn't featured in the list!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Doesn't this post belong to Friday Frolics? Anyways, 2.3 footprints and 1.3 planets. I think if we broach onto the moon, there's sufficient resources if I conquered the world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I took mine (posted it too), and it's 5.2. Bloody hell.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm looking at 2.7
    Guess we are getting out of hand

    ReplyDelete
  8. CATEGORY GLOBAL HECTARES

    FOOD 0.8

    MOBILITY 1.4

    SHELTER 1.6

    GOODS/SERVICES 4.8

    TOTAL FOOTPRINT 8.6

    ReplyDelete
  9. woahh damn..so many things i duno how to answer! i duno the sq.meter of my mum's hse!!! >.< hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  10. darnit..5.6 planets..i m screwed big time now eh..about lunch..give me a call when you got the time..i m almost every day free..haha lunch with big blogger is top priority..

    ReplyDelete
  11. i thought you were bad, until I did mine.... I think coz I live far away from work... total footprint 7.3. Sigh sigh...

    ReplyDelete
  12. argh...

    my total footprint is 10.7 and 5.9 planets... gah... dis is bad... very very bad... asstha needs to pull her weight around more... *sigh*

    ReplyDelete
  13. 9 and 5 planets haha! i bet everyone else is lying on the questions as well

    ReplyDelete
  14. foot print - 4.5
    planets - 2.5

    footnote : i'm an environmental engineer who smoke. sad eh ? :(

    ReplyDelete
  15. I got almost same like yours

    Total FOOTPRINT = 4.2

    &

    IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 2.3 PLANETS.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 4.3 footprints ; though my m'bike got banned 10 yrs ago.

    2.3 planets ; abit biased :X

    ReplyDelete
  17. Seok Thong - we're almost the same.

    Jonny - ahhh.. wait till u start work... things will change drastically. haha... so i guess we should all wear a mask eh?

    day dreamer - not too bad but... still need more than 1 :P

    LaSh - oh really. So bad la that test. take one nearest lor.

    Cirnelle - 1.3? i dont believe it... something must be wrong...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Tine - haha... easy way out for us eh? 5.2!!!

    zeroimpact - anything above 1 is bad... ours.. very bad

    Angel Eyes - that probably be about 4++ planets?

    Huei - that one simply taruh lor.

    constant craver joe - hahaha... ok. 6.6 must be the meat thingy.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Princess Eileen - hahaha... i was bad? you're more than 3 planets i think.

    aSstHa - wahh... must be driving a lot and too much meat!

    friendfromtaiwan - did you read some of my previous post? you will love it.

    alan zed - not any worse than medical doctors who smoke.

    Albert Yap - so you're the lowest so far :)

    -=Sin=- - oh... you're also the lowest at the moment. so you're saying you're force to drive car?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Total footprint = 2.1

    IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.2 PLANETS.

    *shows peace sign*

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have 15.4 foot print, and I need 8.6 planet.

    Shit!

    ReplyDelete
  22. IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 3.2 GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.

    WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 1.8 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE GLOBAL HECTARES PER PERSON.



    IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 1.4 PLANETS.


    (=_=)" thats not good...

    ReplyDelete
  23. 2.5 and i need 1.4 planets. Not too bad, I suppose

    ReplyDelete
  24. TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4.3
    NEED 2.4 PLANETS

    Hmn.. Yeah. Definitely too much meat and drive around. Any available planets around that is comfortable equipted with all necessary utilities? Reasonable price please.. LOL~

    ReplyDelete
  25. Total footprint = 4
    Planets needed = 2.2

    Not the worst, but definitely not the best. Gotta work harder at saving this planet.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Zewt,

    yea.. u're rite altho the meat thingy is lower compared to the driving... wat to do? home's in BU n job is in TPM... bf is in Shah Alam... gym in Subang... *haih*...

    mayb i shud jz move to Puchong wer it's nearer to work... >_<

    ReplyDelete
  27. every moment i'm sitting in front my laptop typing this comment is probably about about worth 5 planets footprint.

    that's cause i'm an IT worker. Without electricity, i probably will be out of a job, unlike yourself, an accountant. (^ ^)

    ReplyDelete
  28. me fail. can't even answer how big my town is. *phaiseh

    ReplyDelete
  29. Will take the test but dun have any high hopes of making it out in one planet.. so to speak. lol

    ReplyDelete
  30. 2.4 planet is good or bad leh? I guess 1 is ideal? Hehehe

    ReplyDelete
  31. Rabbit - 1.2!!!! are you sure? you dont eat meat at all ah?

    Elizebeth DL - shit indeed... shit indeed... make sure your ring dont drop into it.

    Calvin's wife - better than a lot of us... rabbit needs 1.2 .... but then again, anything more than 1 is bad.

    Terra Shield - not bad... i guess that's the best we can hope for.

    rinnah - the planet is within our reach already. it's a matter of how long we can preserve it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Soulblade - hahaha... i think 100m would be a reasonable price if you can find one.

    aSstHa - wooaah.. that's a lot of driving... arent u sick of the jam? i would.

    Angie Tan - nowadays... accountant needs a lot of electricity too... since everything is online. we are all guilty.

    HC Tan - then simply taruh or google a bit lor.

    Helen - still... how many?

    Doreed - i guess 2.4 is bad but not that bad... one reader here has the record of 8.6!

    ReplyDelete
  33. I got 1.9...WHEEEEEEEEEEE~! is that good? O.o Maybe cause i havent got my license.

    XP

    ReplyDelete
  34. Mine,

    Total footprint: 6.6

    Planet: 3.7

    -_-"

    ReplyDelete
  35. I thought my 4.6 planets was really bad...but after seeing what alot of ppl get.. a bit relieved..haha. But in reality.. if everyone like this, mati lor. Clear the way for Mars! XD

    ReplyDelete
  36. gasp!! i needed 10 planets!! i'll take mercury, saturn, neptune......

    actually, i think it's not very accurate lah. doesn't take into a/c one's recycling efforts. i banyak good at recycling one.

    ReplyDelete
  37. the jam ain't dat bad actually (me cutting line... not to mention taking 2 tolls, 1.60 n 2.20 cos i'm always late... n wanna avoid d jam if i bypass the 2.20 cos i drive a manual...)

    normally the jam is bad if i head home straight after work.. if i go to the gym den it's not so bad... haih... wat to do... am steering towards a new career path ma... some sacrifices have to be made..no?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Oh, oh ... 5.4. Not so good, huh? Must try harder. :)

    ReplyDelete
  39. Uh-oh.. i don't really know a lot of things. Like how many ppl are they living in Malaysia and how big my house is! bUT BOOHOoo.. I needed 3.8 planets!

    Boohoo.. I thought I was environmental conscious!

    ReplyDelete
  40. that's so strange. even if I picked the most ecological-friendly answer, my footprint seems to be larger. you sure this is accurate ah? *konpius*

    ReplyDelete
  41. AngryYoungChild - so... with a driving licence... u will probably be needing... 2.5?

    jun - hey... how are you? 3.7 is pretty much!

    Jason - the truth is... we are really killing our earth. got mars also useless ler.

    me - 10!!!!! recycle also useless la.

    aSstHa - if you leave work and go the gym... then it's ok la... better than slogging in the office and then going home late, right?

    Tunku Halim - that's actually quite bad... haha!

    Princess Shin - i tot i was too. i guess we are all guilty. you're not alone.

    may - i did a simulation too. i managed to keep it at 1 planet woh.

    ReplyDelete
  42. mine is 1.5 planet... haha... i guess my life requirements are pretty low already but still, nothing is the best for the world. :) development to us means pain to mother nature

    ReplyDelete
  43. Thanks for the link for the earth thingy... Id like to see how much of earth I take-up.. :)


    Just did the test.. 23.6 footprints and 13.1 Planets!

    ReplyDelete
  44. conan cat - but development is necessary... i believe so.

    russ - 13.1 !!!! *faint*!!

    ReplyDelete
  45. 1.4 planets!! its not that bad!! as for an environment blog i would like to suggest the accidental environmentalist
    http://blog.jollygreengirl.com

    ReplyDelete
  46. confessing7girl - 1.4 is very good actually... shall visit that blog.

    ReplyDelete

"The author cannot be held responsible for any comments or trackbacks that may deem as sensitive or controversial."